Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues
age 14+
Burgundy returns in irreverent sequel with innuendo galore.
- Review Date: December 20, 2013
- Rated: PG-13
- Genre: Comedy
- Release Year: 2013
- Running Time: 119 minutes
Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues gallery
What parents need to know
Positive role models
Violence
Sex
Language
Consumerism
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Parents Need to Know
Parents need to know that Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues is the sequel to the 2004 Will Ferrell comedy Anchorman. As with the first one, the movie includes outrageous, irreverent humor, with comical violence -- mostly bloodless and with few casualties -- and plenty of sexual banter and innuendo, though no nudity. Language is also playful and strong, with uses of "bitch," "ass," and many other choice words. The main characters comically smoke crack while on the air, and there's some background drinking and smoking. There's also some comical racial stereotyping, but mostly at the expense of the speaker. Overall, the message about the importance of family and the quality of news is an interesting one, and could give parents and teens something to discuss together.
User reviews
Parents say
Kids say
What's the story?
After the events of the previous movie, anchorman Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell) is happily married to his co-anchor Veronica Corningstone (Christina Applegate) and things couldn't be better -- until Veronica is promoted and Ron is fired. Ron takes the news badly and bottoms out when he is approached about joining a new 24-hour news cable network. Ron scoffs at the idea, but takes the job and finds great success as he changes tactics, making the news "fun" rather than informative. He begins an intense relationship with his boss, Linda Jackson (Meagan Good), but fate takes another turn when an accident robs him of his sight. While blind, he discovers that his family is his strongest anchor -- his family and a baby shark.
Is it any good?
QUALITY
Co-writers Will Ferrell and Adam McKay hit upon a brilliant idea in their return to their beloved Ron Burgundy character; since we left Ron in the late 1970s, it only makes sense that he should be part of the 24-hour news cycle of the 1980s, as well as the deterioration of TV news and its transformation into ratings-based entertainment. The dumb, yet confident Burgundy is the perfect character for it. This clever thread alone makes the movie worth viewing. But happily, it's very funny, too.
Ferrell and McKay base most of their humor on unexpected, bizarrely rhythmic wordplay and images that support that wordplay. Not every joke is going to work for every viewer. Parts of the movie go over the top, and it definitely sprawls a bit, nearly hitting the two-hour mark. But the best jokes are spread generously throughout, and performers like Kristen Wiig and Meagan Good are quite wonderful in a movie dominated by men. It's a worthy sequel that tickles the brain as well as the funnybone.
Families can talk about...
- Families can talk about the movie's comical violence. What makes violence on screen funny, as opposed to thrilling or disturbing? Do you think comical violence ever goes too far?
- How do you react to the movie's scenes of racial stereotyping? Were they offensive or funny? Who is the target of this humor?
- What does the movie have to say about the state of TV news? Does it approve or disapprove? How has the situation changed since the 1980s?
Movie details
| Theatrical release date: | December 20, 2013 |
| DVD release date: | April 1, 2014 |
| Cast: | David Koechner, Paul Rudd, Steve Carell, Will Ferrell |
| Director: | Adam McKay |
| Studio: | Paramount Pictures |
| Genre: | Comedy |
| Run time: | 119 minutes |
| MPAA rating: | PG-13 |
| MPAA explanation: | crude and sexual content, drug use, language and comic violence |
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.
About Our Rating System
The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.
Great handpicked alternatives
-
Silly comedy that's definitely not for kidsage 15+ -
This raucous, boisterous comedy is not for kids.age 17+
-
A one-joke sex comedy that is not for kids.age 17+
-
Super bawdy, super profane -- and super funny.age 16+
For kids who love comedy
Browse more movies
Top advice and articles
What parents and kids say
Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines
Very Funnny
This is an amazing follow up to the hilarious 2004 comedy. However, this movie is not for kids. There is some intense language, two uses of f**k, a couple uses of b****h, one use of a**, several uses of h*** and d**m, and a couple uses of s**t. The sex is not too bad, just a couple of lewd references, that will surley make your teens laugh, and some suggestive sex scenes. But, the content is not too extreme, and teens about the age of 12 and up will be able to handle it.
What other families should know
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much consumerism
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Was this review useful?
Decent silly and dum
Anchorman 2 just like the first one is crude sexist shock humour but if you can get over that it is funny. Brick gets more screen time. And there is violence one extremely violent scene involving a deep fryer.l language is one use of f**k bi**h he*l da*n hymen and more sex is one brief sex scene no nudity. Also a lot of sex jokes but every scene Ron spends with is son is big laughs it is a decent dum silly comedy for mature 12 year olds
Was this review useful?
Great movie
This movie was very funny. Ron and his friends had no common sense although Ron and his friends do help each other in a comical way.
What other families should know
Great role models
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Was this review useful?
