Flowers in the Attic Movie Poster Image

Flowers in the Attic



'80s pulp novel gets creepy with evil adults, incest.
  • Rated: NR
  • Genre: Drama
  • Release Year: 2014
  • Running Time: 90 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Since the plot features a family who locks up and then tries to kill the family's children, positive messages are in short supply.

Positive role models

The adults in this movie are terrifying and evil. But Chris and Cathy are resourceful and eventually take their lives into their own hands (while also involved in an incestuous relationship).


The violence is rather tame (whipping and lots of talk of whipping, pushing, slapping), but very scary for kids to watch because it's from an adult authority figure, directed at a helpless child.


Sexual content is limited to kissing, talk, and a scene where two characters lie in bed together with the male character shirtless post-coital, but since the sex in question is between a brother and sister, parents or young viewers may be deeply disturbed.


A few words  like "hell" and "damn," and lots of hissed-between-the-teeth language about children being "devil's spawn" and born evil.


Flowers in the Attic is based on a novel, which viewers may want to read after watching the movie. Since the novel is very racy and controversial, parents may not appreciate that.

Drinking, drugs, & smoking

At an adult party, there are what looks like wine glasses and drinks on a table; no one acts drunk.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that Flowers in the Attic is a drama based on a very popular 1980s pulp novel about a family whose children are locked in an attic by a scary mother and grandmother. Incest is a major theme since the children are a product of it, and the older siblings eventually become intimate, though only kissing is visible. Violence is limited to whipping, slapping, and shoving with a lot of menacing talk about punishments, but since the violence is doled out by adult authority members, it could be extra frightening for young viewers to watch. A few mild four-letter words are used, and the grandmother calls the children many names, including devil's spawn and devil's issue.

What's the story?

As FLOWERS IN THE ATTIC opens, the Dollanganger clan has it all. Gorgeous, successful couple Christopher and Corinne (Heather Graham) have four beautiful children: teenage Chris (Mason Dye) and Cathy (Kiernan Shipka), plus young twins Cory and Carrie. But one night, Christopher is killed in a terrible car accident, and, without job skills and unable to support her family, Corinne brings them to the home of her cruel parents. Years ago, they disowned her when she married Christopher who was actually a close-enough relative to make things creepy. The kids, it turns out, are the products of this incestuous relationship. Now Corinne plans to keep them hidden in an attic until she can bring her father around and convince him to let her inherit his millions despite her illicit marriage. Corinne's terrifying mother (Ellen Burstyn) is in on the scheme, and every day brings the children food in a picnic basket, including powdered-sugar doughnuts with one special, menacing ingredient. Corinne comes to visit less and less...and so the loveless and lonely Chris and Cathy turn to each other for their most intimate emotions.

Is it any good?


This is a guilty pleasure for women of a certain age -- just think carefully before you let the kids see it. Parents who remember reading the original book in a breathless rush at camp or hidden under a bedsheet want to know one thing: Does Flowers in the Attic go there? The original book has full-on brother-sister incest, kinda-sorta rape, a murderous mom, and more absolutely purple plot points. Does the TV movie version of Flowers in the Attic have all that stuff? In contrast to the tame 1987 film, yep! Most of the incest action happens offscreen, but there are a couple of decidedly non-filial bro-sis kisses, then cut to Cathy and Chris cuddling in bed and Chris declaring his unending love for her, in a scene that would be kinda sweet if it weren't creepy.

This Flowers of the Attic also nails the menace of the grandmother, with a scene-chewing performance by Ellen Burstyn that could give even adults nightmares. Heather Graham as Corinne and the young actors who play Cory and Carrie aren't as good, but they have less to do in the movie, anyway. Shipka, best known as the nuanced daughter Sally Draper from Mad Men, is a sympathetic character who manages to ground some of the more melodramatic plot points and makes us care about Cathy Dollanganger, at least in the sense that we want to see what will happen next. Not to worry, book-version fans, all the scenes you remember and love are here, and nicely done.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about how realistic the story Flowers in the Attic is. Would a set of children really allow themselves to be imprisoned this way? Would they begin looking pale and sick as the Dollanganger children do?

  • How does the original novel Flowers in the Attic compare to the movie? Is it more believable or less? Do you relate more to the characters, or less?

  • Who is the main character in Flowers in the Attic? How can you tell? Is this character heroic or an anti-hero? Why?

Movie details

DVD/Streaming release date:April 15, 2014
Cast:Ellen Burstyn, Heather Graham, Kiernan Shipka
Director:Deborah Chow
Studio:A&E Home Video
Topics:Brothers and sisters
Run time:90 minutes
MPAA rating:NR

This review of Flowers in the Attic was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

  • Adventureland Poster Image
    Fairly thoughtful romcom masquerades as a raunchy indie.
  • The Way, Way Back Poster Image
    Refreshing coming-of-age tale a joy for teens and up.
  • The Americans Poster Image
    Period spy drama blends violence, sex, and '80s nostalgia.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 13 years old Written bylaura926 February 17, 2014

Not bad adaptation to the novel!

The many gist of the story is probably inappropriate for young children, and possibly some teenagers. The movie is dark, and creepy, and also has some scary images. There is little cursing, and the only drinking is at a party, but two siblings make love, resulting in incest. I read the novel as well, and do agree this adaptation is fairly true to the novel. If you are younger than fourteen, I would recommend waiting to watch this movie. A grandmother abuses her grandchildren, and a mother slaps her children, rather violently, however Chris and Cathy resume a parenting role to their siblings and set examples for both of them while they are locked in the attic. The mother is greedy, and demonstrates more love to money than her own children's lives. Overall a great adaptation for Flowers in the Attic, with great actors.
What other families should know
Great messages
Great role models
Teen, 17 years old Written byiloverockyroad March 19, 2014

This contains spoilers... but these are my thoughts...

I feel that this film is great for individuals in high school or older. There is mild physical violence (hitting, whipping, lashing...) but there is murder of a younger child. The truly offensive thing I found in this movie was the intensest relationship between the two eldest children. I thought the acting was great though, a good film.
Teen, 15 years old Written byHBayazeed April 13, 2014

Better than what you might expect!

Indeed, Lifetimes' Flowers in the Attic is better than the 80's version, loyalty wise, thus there is incest, which might be disturbing for some viewers. Despite, there are some talented people in this film (Ellen Brustyn and Heather Graham) and the kids in this film are really good. Flowers in the Attic is dark, dreary and claustrophobic, but it is a well made TV film, however it can be distinguished as qualified only for TV. The plot can be very disturbing for younger viewers, however touching in a sense, the ending is however heartbreaking it is satisfying for the viewers at the same time. Flowers in the Attic is more recommended than the 80's version, however it is not a flawless film. Parents should be picky about what their teens watch.
What other families should know
Great messages
Great role models
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking