Freakonomics

Movie review by
S. Jhoanna Robledo, Common Sense Media
Freakonomics Movie Poster Image
Engaging economic docu is too complex for young kids.
  • PG-13
  • 2010
  • 86 minutes

Parents say

age 9+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

age 12+
Based on 2 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

The movie suggests that if you ask different questions, you'll get surprising answers. And if you want people to change behavior, figure out what they really want to give them the right incentive.

Positive Role Models & Representations

Some teens are bribed with $50 a month to raise their grades; the monetary incentive (plus a ride in a limo) proves motivating.

Violence

Disturbing, graphic photos of a man bleeding heavily from his head and, later, of his corpse; discussion of the might of the Japanese yakuza.

Sex

A stripper scene shows half-naked women with their breasts covered by computer-generated images. Vague references to a girl named Temptress who isn’t choosy.

Language

A few uses of “s--t.” A piece of paper is shown with "f--k" written on it.

Consumerism

The film promotes the best-selling book of the same title.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Some discussions about the crack epidemic of the 1980s as vials of crack are shown on screen.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this engaging documentary based on the same-named book tries to explain some complicated and unorthodox economic theories by examining unusual questions ... and consequently arriving at unexpected conclusions (such as linking a drop in the crime rate to the legalization of abortion 20 years earlier). Although most of the content isn't too strong -- there's some language (including "s--t") and a handful of scenes that feature violence or near-nudity -- younger viewers might find the whole thing too hard to grasp.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Parent of a 6 and 10 year old Written byimw1984 September 4, 2017

Like Common Sense said, too complex for young kids

Both my 6.75yo and my just-turned-10yo watched this with me the other day. We paused it a lot to talk about things. They both enjoyed it, but I feel the younger... Continue reading
Teen, 16 years old Written byH2O Family November 12, 2010
Teen, 13 years old Written byedshu33 August 17, 2011

Excellent

A solid documentary, I'm fourteen and found it exhilerating. The way that they were able to take the segment about how abortion is ocrrelated to crime and... Continue reading

What's the story?

Based on the bestselling book of the same name, FREAKONOMICS attempts to break down dense economic theories and data into digestible bits. Comprising four main documentary segments, each made by a different director -- including Super Size Me’s Morgan Spurlock, Taxi to the Dark Side’s Alex Gibney, Why We Fight’s Eugene Jarecki, and Jesus Camp’s Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady -- the film examines trends and widely held assumptions and arrives at useful wisdom. Subject matter ranges from real estate to abortion to sumo, and along with the standard interviews and scenes of real people doing real things, the film also uses animated sequences to illustrate some key points.

Is it any good?

As good as such wonky material can get, Freakonomics is an admirable attempt at discourse, relying not just on the printed page but also visuals. In many ways, it succeeds: The four main segments are weighty, interesting, and, yes, sometimes controversial, including Levitt’s theory that legalized abortion led to decreased incidents of violent crime 20 years later. And some insights are meaty: Reading parenting books won’t help you raise a child who’s better and cooler; causation isn’t correlation; the sport of sumo is artful, yes, but quite possibly troubled; social and moral incentives matter.

Nevertheless, Freakonomics lacks cohesion, which may not be all that surprising given how it stitches disparate “episodes” fashioned by different directors sourced from a book written by two authors. Having a handful of directors with different storytelling techniques makes the movie feel disjointed; of all of them, Gibney’s sumo expose is most lyrical and Jarecki’s most surprising. It feels like five episodes from a TV series that we’d love to follow. Flaws aside, it's worth watching, if only to give your brain an entertaining workout.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the difference between correlation and causality. Do you understand why things that happen at the same time might not be related? Can you explain the difference between these two key concepts?

  • Do you think that the book Freakonomics was a good choice to make into a movie? Do you think these complex concepts work well on the screen? Can you think of any other unlikely books that were made into movies, good or bad?

Movie details

For kids who love true stories

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate