• Review Date: September 29, 2010
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Documentary
  • Release Year: 2010
  • Running Time: 86 minutes

Common Sense Media says

Engaging economic docu is too complex for young kids.
  • Review Date: September 29, 2010
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Documentary
  • Release Year: 2010
  • Running Time: 86 minutes





What parents need to know

Positive messages

The movie suggests that if you ask different questions, you'll get surprising answers. And if you want people to change behavior, figure out what they really want to give them the right incentive.

Positive role models

Some teens are bribed with $50 a month to raise their grades; the monetary incentive (plus a ride in a limo) proves motivating.


Disturbing, graphic photos of a man bleeding heavily from his head and, later, of his corpse; discussion of the might of the Japanese yakuza.


A stripper scene shows half-naked women with their breasts covered by computer-generated images. Vague references to a girl named Temptress who isn’t choosy.


A few uses of “s--t.” A piece of paper is shown with "f--k" written on it.


The film promotes the best-selling book of the same title.

Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Some discussions about the crack epidemic of the 1980s as vials of crack are shown on screen.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this engaging documentary based on the same-named book tries to explain some complicated and unorthodox economic theories by examining unusual questions ... and consequently arriving at unexpected conclusions (such as linking a drop in the crime rate to the legalization of abortion 20 years earlier). Although most of the content isn't too strong -- there's some language (including "s--t") and a handful of scenes that feature violence or near-nudity -- younger viewers might find the whole thing too hard to grasp.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

Based on the bestselling book of the same name, FREAKONOMICS attempts to break down dense economic theories and data into digestible bits. Comprising four main documentary segments, each made by a different director -- including Super Size Me’s Morgan Spurlock, Taxi to the Dark Side’s Alex Gibney, Why We Fight’s Eugene Jarecki, and Jesus Camp’s Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady -- the film examines trends and widely held assumptions and arrives at useful wisdom. Subject matter ranges from real estate to abortion to sumo, and along with the standard interviews and scenes of real people doing real things, the film also uses animated sequences to illustrate some key points.

Is it any good?


As good as such wonky material can get, Freakonomics is an admirable attempt at discourse, relying not just on the printed page but also visuals. In many ways, it succeeds: The four main segments are weighty, interesting, and, yes, sometimes controversial, including Levitt’s theory that legalized abortion led to decreased incidents of violent crime 20 years later. And some insights are meaty: Reading parenting books won’t help you raise a child who’s better and cooler; causation isn’t correlation; the sport of sumo is artful, yes, but quite possibly troubled; social and moral incentives matter.

Nevertheless, Freakonomics lacks cohesion, which may not be all that surprising given how it stitches disparate “episodes” fashioned by different directors sourced from a book written by two authors. Having a handful of directors with different storytelling techniques makes the movie feel disjointed; of all of them, Gibney’s sumo expose is most lyrical and Jarecki’s most surprising. It feels like five episodes from a TV series that we’d love to follow. Flaws aside, it's worth watching, if only to give your brain an entertaining workout.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the difference between correlation and causality. Do you understand why things that happen at the same time might not be related? Can you explain the difference between these two key concepts?

  • Do you think that the book Freakonomics was a good choice to make into a movie? Do you think these complex concepts work well on the screen? Can you think of any other unlikely books that were made into movies, good or bad?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:October 1, 2010
DVD release date:January 25, 2011
Cast:Stephen J. Dubner, Steven D. Levitt
Directors:Alex Gibney, Eugene Jarecki, Heidi Ewing, Morgan Spurlock, Rachel Grady, Seth Gordon
Studio:Magnolia Pictures
Run time:86 minutes
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:elements of violence, sexuality/nudity, drugs, and brief strong language

This review of Freakonomics was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 16 years old Written byH2O Family November 12, 2010
Teen, 13 years old Written byedshu33 August 17, 2011


A solid documentary, I'm fourteen and found it exhilerating. The way that they were able to take the segment about how abortion is ocrrelated to crime and put that on film was just perfect, and by making a movie they were able to augment the messages about how the entire human universe runs on seemingly insignifigant factors. Of course, not many yound children will take interest in corruption in Japanese sumo wrestling or the truth about the real estate market, but if they do, it is still excellent.
What other families should know
Great messages


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Digital Compass