Lara Croft: Tomb Raider

  • Review Date: July 24, 2003
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2001
  • Running Time: 100 minutes

Common Sense Media says

Some great action sequences, but not much else.
  • Review Date: July 24, 2003
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Action/Adventure
  • Release Year: 2001
  • Running Time: 100 minutes

Age(i)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Quality(i)

 

What parents need to know

Violence

Intense action violence, guns, explosions, peril, some deaths.

Sex

Implied nudity (male and female).

Language

A few swear words, some innuendo.

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Drinking and smoking.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that in addition to the extensive action sequences with characters in peril and many deaths (mostly anonymous minions), this movie has a couple of bad words and some implied nudity.

Parents say

Kids say

What's the story?

The lead in TOMB RAIDER is Lady Lara Croft (Angelina Jolie), who is something of a cross between Indiana Jones, Batman, and Barbie. She lives in a huge old mansion with an Alfred-style butler and a computer geek (Noah Taylor) who helps her with technology, except when she doesn't let him – as he meticulously documents each screw he removes from an antique clock she interrupts by smashing it apart. The planets are about to align for the first time in 5000 years, which means that she has just days to collect the two pieces of a triangle that controls time from ruins on opposite sides of the globe. Meanwhile, the bad guys want it, too, and will do anything to try and stop her.

Is it any good?

QUALITY
 

More like a video game than a movie, Tomb Raider has some great action sequences and the ever-watchable Angelina Jolie. What it does not have is much of a plot, interesting characters, or a reason to care about the outcome. A clumsy salute to Raiders of the Lost Ark is just a reminder of how much better that movie is. At least when you are playing the game you have points to keep you going. This movie sags whenever the action stops.

The action sequences are fine for the most part. Jolie has the kickboxing skills and the acting chops to deliver what people who go to this movie want to see, but the screenwriter and director let her down when it comes to the boringly generic bad guys and the missing-father motivation. I guess it is too much to expect the people behind this kind of movie to attempt to create a real character or know very much about women, but even by those standards, this movie gets it so wrong that it interferes with our connection to Lara. She is so tough that she shrugs off the near destruction of her home, but she is willing to risk her live to save a man who has done nothing but betray her. She always looks a little relieved when she gets a chance to fight, and we agree with her.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about why Lara is such a loner, and whether she has any interest in the history or art of the treasures she raids from tombs. They may want to discuss some of the conflicts between people who see antiquities as art for universities and museums and those who consider them sacred items that should never be moved. If you had the chance to stop time and see one person who has died, who would it be?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:June 15, 2001
DVD release date:November 13, 2001
Cast:Angelina Jolie, Daniel Craig, Jon Voight
Director:Simon West
Studio:Paramount Pictures
Genre:Action/Adventure
Run time:100 minutes
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:action violence and some sensuality

This review of Lara Croft: Tomb Raider was written by

About our rating system

  • ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids.
  • OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age.
  • NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids of any age.

Find out more

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging, great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging, good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging, good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging, okay learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 13 years old Written byGabix13 December 12, 2012
AGE
13
QUALITY
 

Cool

Great film, this is worth watching, as for role models and messsges there not positive but not super negative, theres no violence as such more just action, there are maybe around 5 minutes of footage in total not appropriate for children 11 and under, but apart from that id say its ok, but for sensibility reasons Im going to say PG-13, this is the rating on the box and I also believe this is very accurate, if with an adult this may be ok for 11/12 year olds, its depends on the child.
Kid, 9 years old August 9, 2011
AGE
13
QUALITY
 

Too predictible.

Grr, if that bloke didn't say 'HOLY SH*T!' at the last second, it would be 2 stars. The violence is just too predictible.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much swearing
Kid, 10 years old September 12, 2010
AGE
11
QUALITY
 
some bad stuff but one of my favorite movies and this one was better than the second trust me
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Essential Apps Guide