Little Fockers Movie Poster Image

Little Fockers



Battling in-laws face off in formulaic comedy.
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Genre: Comedy
  • Release Year: 2010
  • Running Time: 98 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Although the movie makes it very clear that family is important and fidelity is a priority, there are some confusing messages about in-law relationships. Sometimes it seems like some abuse -- verbal or physical -- is OK. It’s all played for laughs, but it’s still confusing.

Positive role models

A father is protective (actually overprotective) of his daughter, which is admirable, in a way. But he has no boundaries -- for example, he interrogates his son-in-law about whether he’s still attracted to his daughter despite her having had two kids. A woman flirts openly with a married man.


Father-in-law and son-in-law tussle at a child’s birthday, taking swipes at each other while in a ball pit. They also have heated, verbally abusive exchanges. A man accidentally cuts himself, and his blood spurts everywhere at the dinner table.


Some discussion about infidelity. A man’s private parts appear to be erect in his pants. A woman role-plays with her husband and pretends to be another person to add spice to their relationship. A woman prances around in her underwear. One character is a sex therapist. Bikini-clad women drape themselves all over one character.


The name “Focker” is, of course, meant to suggest the word "f--ker" (and characters sometimes pronounce it in a way that emphasizes this). Other language includes several uses of "s--t," "damn," "boobs," "hell," "crap," "ass," and "oh my God" (as an exclamation).


One character (who's pointedly referenced as being more well-off than another) has many symbols of affluence: a fancy car, a mansion, etc.

Drinking, drugs, & smoking

A woman brings a bottle of wine to visit a married man, gets drunk, and then proceeds to "attack" him after she undresses down to her underwear.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that the third comedy in the "Fockers" series (which started with Meet the Parents and continued in Meet the Fockers) mines the same material as the previous two installments: the conflict-filled relationship between a father-in-law and his son-in-law. A few new tweaks -- such as a woman hitting on a man who's clearly married and devoted to his family, as well as discussion about both erectile dysfunction and over-function (there's an apparent erection in one character's pants) -- may be too mature for younger viewers. Also, the animosity between the two main characters verges on disturbing. There's less sexual humor here than in Meet the Fockers, but you can expect some jokes/talk and a scene in which a character gets drunk and strips down to her underwear. There's also some swearing (including "s--t" and plays on the name "Focker") and episodes in which two grown men attack each other.

What's the story?

After the son-in-law he originally favored has an affair, ex-CIA agent Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro) decides that his other son-in-law, Gaylord "Greg" Focker (Ben Stiller), is good enough to entrust with the future of the Byrnes family. Always starved for Jack's approval, Greg takes his mission seriously, but is discouraged when he learns, during a visit from Jack and his mother-in-law (Blythe Danner), that things -- as usual -- aren't as simple as they first seem. Meanwhile, an article that Greg wrote for a medical journal has attracted the attention of an alluring (and persistent) pharmaceutical sales rep (Jessica Alba), who recruits him to be the spokesperson for an erectile dysfunction medication. (He considers it because his kids might have to attend a fancy preschool.) Plus, Greg's wife Pam's (Teri Polo) ex-boyfriend, Kevin (Owen Wilson), is still hung up on her; Greg's father (Dustin Hoffman) is off to Seville to find himself; and his mother (Barbra Streisand) continues to dish out sexual advice while sharing anecdotes about him.

Is it any good?


LITTLE FOCKERS is the third installment in what has proven to be a successful, if entirely predictable, franchise. At this point, De Niro and Stiller have their banter and prickly chemistry down to a science, and they inhabit their tense relationship in a satisfying and believable way. Even the cheesiest lines -- De Niro calling Stiller’s character "the Godfocker," for example -- elicit a chuckle.

The cast is the best thing about the movie, save perhaps for Alba, who appears to be channeling Tea Leoni’s kooky charm in Flirting with Disaster, but with less success. But, honestly, some of the Fockers antics are really tiresome at this point. Shouldn’t Greg and Jack get along by now? A secondary storyline that has Laura Dern playing the director of an uber-preschool is a funny diversion and could have added more interest had it been further explored (perhaps Little Fockers should have attacked helicopter parenting instead?). The film will entertain Fockers fans, but if you didn't like the first two, don't get your hopes up.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the movie's messages about marriage and family. How does having children impact a relationship? How are families with young kids typically portrayed in the media?

  • Why do you think Hollywood makes so many movies that show tension between family members? Do you think that's realistic?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:December 22, 2010
DVD/Streaming release date:April 5, 2011
Cast:Barbra Streisand, Ben Stiller, Dustin Hoffman, Robert De Niro
Director:Paul Weitz
Studio:Universal Pictures
Run time:98 minutes
MPAA rating:PG-13
MPAA explanation:mature sexual humor throughout, language and some drug content

This review of Little Fockers was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Teen, 14 years old Written bymysterious25 April 24, 2011
it was pretty funny
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Teen, 16 years old Written byyms824 November 15, 2015

A sad way to end a great series......

Due to the time it was released, they felt the need it HAD to be raunchy. I generally only like raunchy comedies if I think they are presentable, which unfortunately this is not. It had a few laughs but that was it
What other families should know
Great messages
Great role models
Kid, 10 years old August 10, 2013

Very funny, this time violent and has more sexual content

Sex is more intense. A woman hits on Gaylord, when she knows he is clearly married. She takes off nearly all her clothes and starts kissing him immensely. She jumps on him (while kissing) and they fall out the window of a two story house. After that, two grown men have a violent fist fight and blood is shown. A man beats up another man until he has a deadly heart attack. Language is not any better, "s--t" and "a-s" are said. Also, a kid reapers the word "s--t" at school, which some kids may want to copy. 13+
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?