Piranha 3DD

Movie review by
Jeffrey M. Anderson, Common Sense Media
Piranha 3DD Movie Poster Image
Bloody, sexed-up sequel lacks predecessor's camp appeal.
  • R
  • 2012
  • 83 minutes

Parents say

age 17+
Based on 5 reviews

Kids say

age 17+
Based on 21 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive messages

Greed, corruption, and exploitation are punished in terrible ways, while good characters survive.

Positive role models & representations

The female lead is an outspoken, fairly strong character, although in several scenes she requires rescuing by men.

Violence

Many scenes of bloody mayhem, with lots of scary piranha attacks and many gallons of blood, mostly shown swirling around in water. Viewers see severed limbs and heads, as well as bloody stumps and bloody skeletons, and even a bloody, severed penis. In a very disturbing scene, a piranha is shown sticking out of a fat man's naked bottom. One of the piranhas' victims is a young boy.

Sex

Many topless women are shown, mostly swimming or lounging around a pool. In one shot, a piranha attacks a topless woman's chest. There's a sex scene between a young man and a young woman, though very little is shown. The scene is fairly intense but is interrupted by a piranha attack. A man is shown pleasuring himself, involving a water jet, in a swimming pool (nothing explicit shown). Also heavy innuendo, flirting, foreplay, suggestive dancing, and gratuitous bikini shots.

Language

Language is strong but not constant, and includes several uses of "f--k" and "s--t," plus "p---y," "damn," "oh my God," "d--k," "hell," "vagina," "penis," "ass," "idiot," and "moron."

Consumerism
Drinking, drugs & smoking

The young people in the movie -- who are presumably of legal drinking age -- are shown drinking beer and smoking pot in a few early scenes. A character takes a puff from a joint in a later scene as well (before using it to ignite an explosive).

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Piranha 3DD is a sequel to 2010's surprisingly successful (and entertaining, in a very over-the-top way) Piranha 3D, which was itself a remake of a 1978 movie. While this one unfortunately lacks whatever made the previous movie work, it's just as packed with strong violence, including lots of blood, severed limbs, and even a severed penis. It also features heavy nudity, sexual innuendo, and some sex. Language is also very strong, with many uses of "f--k" and "s--t," as well as beer drinking and pot smoking. Older teens may be drawn to the movie for the promise of nudity implied in the title -- and it's available on demand. Parents, beware.

User Reviews

Adult Written byShivom Oza June 16, 2012

Piranha 3DD (2012) – The DDs Stand For Dumb and Depressing - Shivom Oza

After unleashing terror at Lake Victoria in ‘Pirhana 3D’, the pre-historic shoal of blood-thirsty piranhas infest into a newly-built waterpark, suggestive title... Continue reading
Adult Written byMusicRock668 June 3, 2012

Wate of Time And Money Too Much Nudity !

Please Don't let Teens see this Movie First one was Horrible is full of Nuidty and sex ! 3D is waste of money ! it not appropriate movie !
Teen, 13 years old Written byThe Title Nine June 26, 2012

Overwhelming Sex and Violence.

This movie is flat-out full of sex, and totally bloody in a way that doesn't make sense. I mean, like the Hunger Games, it says that teenagers are forced t... Continue reading
Teen, 15 years old Written byMoviedudde18 September 13, 2012

P3DD

Really dumb, fake, pointless peice of ----.

What's the story?

The attacks of Piranha 3D left an entire vacation resort in ruins, and a news commentator asks, "can it happen again?" It can and does in PIRANHA 3DD at an Arizona water park. Marine biology student Maddy (Danielle Panabaker) returns home for the summer to find that her stepfather (David Koechner) has turned the family water park into a sex attraction, advertising busty lifeguards and an "adult pool" full of naked women. Unfortunately, he's also tapped into an underground lake and released more of the hungry carnivorous fish. With a tall, handsome, crooked cop (Chris Zylka) and a short nerd (Matt Bush) vying for her affections every step of the way, can Maddy save the day?

Is it any good?

While the previous Piranha movie had just the right blend of silliness, exploitation, and fun, Piranha 3DD seems totally lost. It comes across as forced, ugly, offensive, and lazy. The theme park idea could have been enjoyably ridiculous, but director John Gulager treats it with the same callousness as Koechner's character does. Likewise, the piranha attacks are lazy and dumb, using "close calls" to generate artificial suspense. And the movie stoops so low as to show a piranha killing a young boy.

Where the movie succeeds is in its choice of actors. Bush makes an unusual romantic hero, and Panabaker is an appealing and somewhat intelligent heroine. Ving Rhames and Christopher Lloyd, both veterans of the previous film, turn up in small parts, and David Hasselhoff is funny in a self-mocking role. Gary Busey and the director's father, Clu Gulager, appear in the prologue, which -- in a forecast of things to come -- uses cow farts as a plot device.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about Piranha 3DD's violence. Is it intended to be entertaining or disturbing? Can it be both at once? Is that OK?

  • Is the movie scary? What's the difference between scary and bloody?

  • Many of the characters have perfect body types, except one young man who's teased for being too short. Can he still be a hero? What do the heroes of movies and TV shows typically look like? Why do you think that is?

Movie details

For kids who love scares

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate