Requiem for a Dream



Shocking, grim addiction saga worth discussing.
Popular with kidsParents recommend
  • Review Date: November 7, 2005
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Drama
  • Release Year: 2000
  • Running Time: 102 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Principal characters are all doomed addicts and drug users, and their ethnicity and circumstances seem to cut across all genders and ages -- it could happen to anyone, is the implicit message. Nobody here makes a move to save themselves either, though their personal goals are empowerment, not the inevitable self-destruction. Ironically, drug dealer-addict Harry disapproves (quite rightfully) his mother taking diet pills.


Shootings, some at close range. Jailhouse beatings. A violent fantasy about stabbing a character through the hand with a fork. One character's arm develops ghastly, oozing wounds from his IV drug-use needle injections. Another is strapped, force-fed, and electrocuted in a hellish medical environment.


Brief, full-frontal female nudity (in some versions). One character is sexually active with her therapist, her boyfriend, and her pusher. In the unrated version she ultimately descends into full-blown prostitution and performs degrading sex acts -- which aren't shown in clear detail, but you get the idea --- with other women before a live audience. Another couple seen naked having intercourse in profile.


Frequent use of the F-word/MF-word, the S-word, "bitch," and "ass."


One character's mad devotion to a TV game show is key to the plot, though the show is not real.

Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Heroin use, cigarette smoking, and abuse of diet pills (amphetamines) are the central subject. Quick, punchy editing, macrophotography, and rhythmic cuts try to convey the jittery exhilaration of the narcotics. It's hardly intended as a favorable portrayal, of course.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that drug abuse permeates this downbeat drama about people in seemingly hopeless descents. As a final descent into degradation one girl performs in a grotesque lesbian stage-sodomy act to continue getting her heroin -- the "edited version" only cuts out a few microseconds of this. Both versions of this film have enough language, explicit sex, violence, blood, and nudity (included female full-frontal) to merit an R. Both versions try with hypnotic imagery and music to capture both the allure and the insidious damage of intoxicants.

What's the story?

In the Coney Island neighborhood of New York City, four interrelated characters fall prey to chemical addiction over a year. Harry (Jared Leto) and Marion (Jennifer Connelly) are childhood sweethearts, he from the lower classes, she from a rich family, but both are addicted to heroin. Harry nurtures Marion's career goal to open a designer-dress emporium and tries with his friend and fellow addict Tyrone (Marlon Wayans) to peddle drugs to finance the venture. Soon their own cravings and gang-turf wars deplete their supply, and the men go on a disastrous trip to Florida in search of a fresh pipeline, as Marion loses herself in addiction. An unlikelier addict is Harry's middle-aged mother Sarah (Ellen Burstyn) who becomes obsessed with shedding weight to appear slim and pretty on TV. She herself gets hooked on diet pills that alter her thinking and perceptions of reality.

Is it any good?


The conundrum for filmmakers trying to depict the seductive power and destruction wrought by drugs is walking that fine line between making "getting high" look too good on one hand, and on the other hand going too far with the Message Stuff and preaching a finger-wagging sermon. There's no question REQUIEM FOR A DREAM is a movie of extremes; it uses punchy editing and camera tricks to convey the rush of drugs of the characters, right down to the cellular level. By the end the protagonists are literally curled in fetal positions, robbed of everything by their habits (bad drugs, bad!).

But the skillful, surreal camerawork, and the sympathetic characters -- none of them want to be Scarface, they just want to be happy -- make this more than just the proverbial "classroom scare film." Perhaps the most important story, in fact, is Sarah's, who breaks no law in her addiction to amphetamines (diet pills) but ends up as brain-damaged and ruined as any junkie thanks to an impersonal medical-institutional establishment that hands out pills like candy.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the effects of drug addition, in real life and in the media, running the gamut from The Man With the Golden Arm to Trainspotting to countless preachy After-School Specials and even superhero comic books. How effective is Requiem for a Dream as a cautionary tale? Do you think any mere film has the power to change or dissuade an addict? What do kids think of Sarah's "legal" addiction compared to the unlawful activities of the reckless Harry, Marion, and Tyrone? Why do so many real-life celebrities fall into traps of drug habits? You could try to get adventurous readers to tackle the difficult source novel by Hubert Selby Jr. -- but watch out, it's rough, raw stuff too.

Movie details

Theatrical release date:October 27, 2000
DVD release date:August 8, 2001
Cast:Ellen Burstyn, Jared Leto, Jennifer Connelly
Director:Darren Aronofsky
Studio:Artisan Entertainment
Run time:102 minutes
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:extensive depiction of drug addiction, graphic sexuality, strong language and some violence

This review of Requiem for a Dream was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.


Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About our buy links

When you use our links to make a purchase, Common Sense Media earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes. As a nonprofit organization, these funds help us continue providing independent, ad-free services for educators, families, and kids while the price you pay remains the same. Thank you for your support.
Read more

See more about how we rate and review.

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

  • Indie inner-city drama with drug-addict teacher.
  • Provocative animated sci-fi. Not for kids.
  • Graphic look into heroin addiction. Not for kids.

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Parent of a 10 and 10 year old Written bydavid.wallace July 4, 2011

Positive Message: DRUGS ARE BAD

This is an excellent movie. It is also one of the most disturbing films I have seen- that is saying something. There is nudity, violence, and drug use like you have never seen. The reason that I feel even young teens should see this movie is simple. Teens WILL be exposed to drugs and this movie will show them what happens to addicts. This movie takes away all the glamour that other shows associate with drugs. It is a movie kids will remember when they are offered a hit of drugs. If they see it they will not take the hit.
What other families should know
Great messages
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Kid, 12 years old February 10, 2010

Good messages about drugs, extremely depressing and graphic with sex and language

First of all even this movie has a good message about drugs, it's very depressing and sexually graphic and contains muchos language. They say f--k, motherf--ker, s--t, b-tch, a--, hell, etc. It is not pervasively violent, but the violence that is shown is pretty strong (shootings, torture, etc.). The sex is way graphic. It shoes female nudity (full frontal) and shows lesbian and straight sex acts (along with prostitution in the unrated version). Drug use is constant and graphic but has a good message about what drugs can do to any person (black or white, male or female, 10 or 80). It is very depressing and there is no hope for any of the characters. Iffy for ages 17+, if i had kids I wouldn't let them see until they moved out.
What other families should know
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking
Great messages
Teen, 13 years old Written bythedigitalmastermind July 15, 2011

Great movie, dark, violent, disturbing, sexual, and gritty.

This is a dark, dream-like motion picture. It involves various addictions in which the characters are driven to tragic ends. An old mother is driven to a tragic insanity, and there are scenes of disturbing hallucinations, scary violence, and some excessive drug use and somewhat graphic sex scenes, not visually, but it is graphic from what the viewer imagines, as one female goes into sex shows for prostitution. It is a great movie, but only for the most advanced, mature tweens and teens.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much drinking/drugs/smoking


Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Special Needs Guide