Rings
By Jeffrey Anderson,
Common Sense Media Reviewer
Common Sense Media Reviewers
Some scares in otherwise dull, unnecessary horror sequel.

A Lot or a Little?
What you will—and won't—find in this movie.
Where to Watch
Videos and Photos
Rings
Community Reviews
Based on 11 parent reviews
Good Scary Movie
Report this review
Ring ring yo!
Report this review
What's the Story?
In RINGS, the cycle of the mysterious video and subsequent deaths continues. After a plane crash kills the latest victim, a professor (Johnny Galecki), visits an estate sale and buys an old VCR. Inside he finds the death-causing tape and watches it; he then receives the inevitable phone call that he'll die in seven days. He saves his own life by "passing on" the curse to others, including clean-cut college student Holt (Alex Roe) and his girlfriend, Julia (Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz). With the curse resting on Julia, she and Holt begin investigating, using the images she sees in the deadly video. They're led to a dying small town and the home of a blind man (Vincent D'Onofrio) who may know more than he lets on.
Is It Any Good?
This lethargic, sadly unnecessary horror sequel attempts more of the same mythology but quickly proves to be utterly boring, with dull characters, no genuine scares, and nothing to say. Following the American films The Ring (2002) and The Ring Two (2005) and based on the original series of Japanese novels (by Koji Suzuki) and movies, Rings adds nothing to the franchise's mythology, with the possible exception of updating the old VHS tape to new, digital files that can be played on phones and desktops.
The characters' attempt to solve the mystery only begs the question: Didn't they already take care of this in the last couple of movies? And being stuck with the two main characters doesn't help; they're arguably the dullest couple ever to grace a horror movie. Director F. Javier Gutierrez goes for only jump-scares -- including the sudden opening of an umbrella! -- but they're so glumly routine that it's impossible not to guess when they're coming. In the end, this Rings is less "lord" and more "bored."
Talk to Your Kids About ...
Families can talk about Rings' violence. How much is shown, and how much is implied? Would the movie have been scarier or less scary with more gore? Why or why not? What's the impact of media violence on kids?
Is the movie scary? What's the appeal of scary movies?
How does this movie compare to the previous entries in the Ring movie series? Why do you think it took so long for the next one to get made?
If this happened to you, would you choose to "pass on" the curse to someone else, or would you try to find another solution? Why?
What do these movies have to say about the way we share media with each other?
Movie Details
- In theaters: February 3, 2017
- On DVD or streaming: May 2, 2017
- Cast: Johnny Galecki , Alex Roe , Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz
- Director: F. Javier Gutierrez
- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Genre: Horror
- Topics: Monsters, Ghosts, and Vampires
- Run time: 117 minutes
- MPAA rating: PG-13
- MPAA explanation: violence/terror, thematic elements, some sexuality and brief drug material
- Last updated: March 5, 2023
Did we miss something on diversity?
Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.
Suggest an Update
Where to Watch
Our Editors Recommend
Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.
See how we rate