The Killing Fields

Movie review by
Barbara Shulgasser-Parker, Common Sense Media
The Killing Fields Movie Poster Image
Intense, violent movie about brutal Cambodian regime.
  • R
  • 1984
  • 142 minutes

Parents say

age 15+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

age 15+
Based on 1 review

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

We think this movie stands out for:

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

With resourcefulness, smarts, and lots of luck, a person might survive a terrible war. The consequences for selfishness can sometimes be almost too much to bear. War begets war. The American venture in Vietnam affected the lives of millions of Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Americans. 

Positive Role Models & Representations

Schanberg is a driven, unstoppable reporter who expects everyone he works with to be as single-minded as he, but with his determination comes arrogance and obliviousness to the needs of others. Pran is brave, loyal, and resourceful. His extraordinary people skills save Schanberg and others several times as he persuades armed soldiers to let him and his group go unharmed.  Friends of Pran desperately try to forge a British passport that will allow him to safely leave Cambodia. Pran does his best to save someone's little boy


An ugly and brutal war is portrayed with bloody, mutilated bodies strewn about. People are executed on screen. One man is shot in the face. Many murders are performed casually, with blatant disregard for the importance of human life.  A man falls into a pit of skeletons. A girl puts a plastic bag over a victim's head and suffocates him. Children inform on grownups. People are beaten and tied uncomfortably to trees. An entire city's population is force-marched to a rural area where they are held for slave labor, beaten, and starved. A starving man slits the skin of an ox and sips the animal's blood for sustenance.



A mother and nursing child are glimpsed.


"F--k," "s--t," and "ass."


A Coca-Cola warehouse and drinks are prominently displayed.


Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

People smoke cigarettes and adults drink alcohol.


What parents need to know

Parents need to know that The Killing Fields is a 1984 drama about the horrors of a 1970s Cambodian regime that were in part unleashed by wrong-headed American policies during the war in neighboring Vietnam. An American reporter dangerously stays too long to cover the atrocities and leaves his Cambodian journalist partner and translator behind to suffer torture, starvation, and forced labor under Khmer Rouge rule, a harsh regime known for its disregard for human life and for "cleansing" the country of two million innocent "undesirable" citizens. Bloody murders, bombings, and unspeakable atrocities are either shown or suggested. A man with a young boy in his arms steps on a land mine and both die. Hundreds of bodies and skeletons are strewn on roads and in rice paddies. Inhumanity is broadly represented, but so is kindness and generosity as people work together to try to save lives. Children are both informants and murderers here. Adults drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes. Language includes "f--k" and "s--t."   

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byWalter White February 10, 2021
Teen, 17 years old Written byFilmmakerofAnime August 13, 2018
It has the best cinematography which won the Academy Awards for Best Cinematography including 2 wins for Best Supporting Actor and Best Film Editing but the gre... Continue reading

What's the story?

THE KILLING FIELDS tells a true, similar story to the one at the heart of First They Killed My Father, although here the emphasis is on the efforts of foreign war correspondents to publicize the fate of millions of innocent Cambodians being destroyed by American bombs and an insurgent Communist government that ruled by terror and murder. Award-winning journalist Sydney Schanberg (Sam Waterston) is a driven New York Times reporter who risks his life to unearth the truth about secret American bombings in Cambodia as the failing Vietnam war was sending its mayhem to the Southeast Asian country next door. His partner in journalism and translator is Dith Pran (Haing S. Nor), a resourceful and courageous Cambodian who also risks his life daily for The New York Times. Schanberg gets himself, Pran, and his family on an evacuation list, but Schanberg decides to stay in the country and cover the story. Out of loyalty and a sense of duty, Pran puts his family on a helicopter and stays behind with Schanberg. When conditions force them to evacuate with the last remaining journalists, the Khmer Rouge, now fully in charge, refuse to allow Cambodians to leave. Efforts are made to forge a British passport for Pran but fail. The last third of the film focuses on Pran's days as a mistreated, starved forced laborer who manages after years to make a break for it and escape. Back home, Schanberg is writing letters to refugee organizations and feeling guilty for not forcing Pran to leave earlier. Note that once Pran returned to the United States he worked as a photographer for The New York Times for many years.

Is it any good?

This is a tension-filled, fast-paced movie about a difficult and bloody time in American and Southeast Asian history. Based on Schanberg and Pran's actual experiences covering the genocidal Khmer Rouge rule in Cambodia, The Killing Fields brings the audience into those terrible times convincingly.

Haing S. Nor, a Cambodian doctor, plays Dith Pran with astonishing focus and intensity. It feels as if Pran is playing himself. Waterston does a great job portraying a man so interested in getting the story that he seems to miss the humanity and suffering of the victims he sees. In one scene back in New York, Schanberg watches a tape of bad deeds in Cambodia and seems more moved by the tape than by seeing the actual atrocities he personally witnessed when he was covering the war. It's to the movie's credit that Schanberg doesn't come off as a hero here. He is often condescending and impatient. His arrogance and single-minded pursuit of stories makes him a great reporter but not much of a human being. He knows he should have insisted Pran leave Cambodia when it was safe to go, but it suited Schanberg better to keep his indispensable translator with him, so he didn't press his friend and colleague to save himself when it was possible. Add to that the fact that Pran had a wife and children and Schanberg had no one and, between the lines, you can discern a true portrait of good character as opposed to one of bluster and bravado.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about why Pran stayed with Schanberg in The Killing Fields when he had the chance to leave with his family. Do you think Pran was willing to risk his life to get more stories for the New York Times? Is it possible Pran believed Schanberg wouldn't survive without his help?

  • The brutal and repressive Khmer Rouge were intent on killing all educated people -- teachers, doctors, lawyers -- so they could indoctrinate, lie to, and control ignorant people into their new way of life. What effect do you think killing a society's educated people can have on a country's future?

  • Why do you think ethnic cleansing and genocide recur throughout history? What purpose do you think it might serve to repressive regimes?

  • What we can do as a society to make sure these atrocities don't happen again?

Movie details

Our editors recommend

For kids who love history

Character Strengths

Find more movies that help kids build character.

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

Streaming options powered by JustWatch

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate