Waking Life

Movie review by
Nell Minow, Common Sense Media
Waking Life Movie Poster Image
Parents recommend
Love-it-or-hate-it film best for older teens.
  • R
  • 2001
  • 99 minutes

Parents say

age 15+
Based on 5 reviews

Kids say

age 16+
Based on 3 reviews

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Positive Messages

Suicide, gunfight, characters killed.




Some strong language.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Drinking, scene in a bar, drug references.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this movie has some very strong language and scenes of cartoon violence, including a shoot-out and a self-immolation. Some teens may be upset by the discussions of death.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written bybigisaac20 July 20, 2020
Adult Written byRarityfan September 5, 2018

Must be seen

Must be seen by yourself as I can't describe this real dream of a movie. I guess this is one of the movies that soon will be forgotten. Some violence and r... Continue reading
Teen, 17 years old Written bystellapappi August 11, 2017

Thought-provoking for things for yourself.

This movie is all about existentialism portrayed through a walk of the main character's lucid dreams..Ages 14-16 might just get bored of it because they wo... Continue reading
Teen, 14 years old Written byArcanely May 17, 2015

An existentialist's dream.

Not speaking for myself, I suggest it for adolescents aged 16 and over. It's a complex existentialist film about the supposed difference between dreaming a... Continue reading

What's the story?

WAKING LIFE doesn't really tell a story. It is just a journey by an unnamed main character (played by Wiley Wiggins) who wanders through an Alice-in-Wonderland-style journey that may or may not be a dream, meeting all kinds of very odd people, many of whom tell him their views on consciousness and the purpose of existence. It recalls director/screenwriter Linklater's first film, Slackers, which showed us a series of loosely linked people expressing views on everything from Madonna's pap smear to the assassination of William McKinley, and his later film, Before Sunrise, in which a young couple meets on a train and spend the rest of the movie walking around Vienna and talking about just about everything. The couple from Before Sunrise, Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke, reprise their roles in one scene, lying in bed talking about consciousness after death. Other actors and characters from Linklater's earlier films flicker through this one as well, their out-of-context familiarity adding to the dreaminess and disorientation. This film is animated. Actually, it is rotoscoped -- originally shot on film (digital film, in this case), then animators paint over the photographed images of real people. Each scene or character had a different group of animators, though the overall look of the film is very consistent.

Is it any good?

People will react very strongly to this movie – they will either love it or hate it. Those who will enjoy it are people who have a lot of tolerance for all-night college dorm discussions of the meaning of life, because this entire movie is a series of monologues and dialogues that are variations on that theme. The animation here offers an extraordinary sense of documentary, even hyper-reality from the ambient noise of the audio and the fact that many of the monologues are delivered by people who are not actors. At times, shapes shift to reflect the discussion.

The monologues themselves are like jazz improvisations, wildly playful, bringing in an astonishing assortment of references and concepts. I think the secret to enjoying this movie is not to engage too much with the individual arguments and points of view but just to allow your ears and spirit to enjoy the fact that there are people who feel passionately about these ideas and who are willing to talk about them to other people with an openness I find humbling and touching. The people who want "real human moments," or "holy moments" of genuine connection come across as authentically vulnerable. Of course, other characters come across as people who talk all the time and barely notice if anyone is listening, but most of the people Wiggins meets want to help him in their own way.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about their own views on the meaning of life and which, if any, of the characters are closest to their own thoughts about dreams and reality. Is it possible to create "lucid dreams?" Is there a reason that a film-maker might be particularly attracted to this idea – could film be a kind of generalized lucid dream? When you are dreaming, are you aware that you are dreaming? How do you know? What does it mean to say that there's only one moment or to talk about the eternal yes? Does this movie make you want to know more about any of the authors or ideas it raises?

Movie details

Our editors recommend

For kids who love quirky movies

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

Streaming options powered by JustWatch

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality.

Learn how we rate