Friends with Benefits

TV review by
Kari Croop, Common Sense Media
Friends with Benefits TV Poster Image
Sexually active friends jump into bed -- with each other.

Parents say

age 12+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

age 18+
Based on 1 review

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this TV show.

Positive Messages

While there's some attempt to equate the long-term emotional support of close friends to that of a makeshift family, there's a much more obvious focus on the short-term physical benefits of casual sex.

Positive Role Models & Representations

No character is completely awful, but most are over-focused on sex and their social lives.

Violence
Sex

Frequent (but intentionally comic) sexual content, including simulated casual sex (no sensitive body parts shown) and sexually charged jokes about things like "vajazzling" and "swinging." There's a general preoccupation with having sex in the context of dating.

Language

Audible words like "hell," "bitch," "douchebag," "ass," "boobs," "balls," etc.

Consumerism
Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Regular social drinking; one character tends bar, so the friends typically hang out there in every episode.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that "friends with benefits" is a loaded term used to describe a friendship involving casual sex with no real romantic connection. And as the title suggests, this sitcom contains frequent sexual content -- from simulated sex to suggestive jokes about swinging -- although most of it is comic in tone and no sensitive body parts are shown. You'll also hear language like "douchebag," "bitch," and "balls," and see regular social drinking.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

Teen, 16 years old Written byShyanneBoland16 May 24, 2013

Frinds

This movie is no good for teens or kids to watch. But i really love this movie because the people in the movi are funny and they make me laght

What's the story?

While taking on the city’s brutal dating scene, five singles remain FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS, which means they’re always there for each other … even in bed. Ben (Ryan Hansen) and Sara (Danneel Ackles) are sleeping together, but both are actively trying to find their perfect match, while Aaron (Zach Cregger), Fitz (Andre Holland), and Riley (Jessica Lucas) are playing the field with their own mix of random hook-ups.

Is it any good?

Friends with Benefits (which isn't to be confused with the big-screen romcom of the same name) took a long time to make it to the airwaves, and whether it remains there seems unlikely. That's not to say it's awful, but it doesn't have enough of the goods to have any real staying power. "Goods" being good characters, good jokes, and good plots.

 

Its attempt to revamp the successful Friends formula with casual sex right from the get-go (as in, right from the very first scene of the very first episode) certainly sends a clear message as to what the show is all about. But that won't be enough for most viewers, who'll likely want their sex with a little more substance.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the real-life consequences of casual sex -- especially when it happens with a friend. If two people can be friends and enjoy a physical relationship, why wouldn't they want to become a committed couple? Is casual sex any "safer" when it happens with someone you know?

  • Who's the target audience here? How can you tell? Do you think the show is designed to appeal to both men and women equally?

  • How realistic are these characters and their romantic problems? Are they relatable?

TV details

For kids who love romance

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate