Rising Star

TV review by
Emily Ashby, Common Sense Media
Rising Star TV Poster Image
Real-time voting gimmick can't save singing contest.

Parents say

age 13+
Based on 2 reviews

Kids say

age 8+
Based on 3 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this TV show.

Positive Messages

The show asks viewers and experts to make hasty judgment calls on performers' talents, and contestants can see as they sing how well or poorly they're being received. The three celebrity panelists don't sugarcoat their criticism and in some cases even make faces or a thumbs-down motion when they don't like what they hear. Biographical segments play up emotional life events such as deaths or illnesses in an attempt to influence voters. 

Positive Role Models & Representations

Contestants put their hearts into their performances, and those who fail usually accept it gracefully. The experts aren't always kind in their reactions to subpar attempts. 

Violence
Sex
Language

"Hell" and "damn" more than once in an episode, mostly from the celebrity panelists.

Consumerism

The show requires viewers to download an app and register via Twitter or Facebook to vote on the performances. There are numerous reminders to do so through the Windows or Apple app stores or through Google Play at the start of each episode. Some contestants auditioned through Instagram, so you'll hear that mentioned as well.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Rising Star is a singing competition that requires the use of the show's app to vote for or against contestants in real time. Voters must register via their Twitter or Facebook accounts and perform a virtual check-in before each performance they want to judge, and they can give their age-based consent to see their own profile pictures displayed on a singers' screen when they send over a "yes" vote. This raises issues of privacy you'll want to discuss with your teens if they plan to tune in. As with many reality competitions, a lot of time is devoted to the celebrity judges and host's rapport, and their reactions to lesser performances can be unkind. Ludacris in particular makes faces, feigns impatience, and sometimes gives a thumbs-down gesture. On the upside, as with any show like this one, it's a great reminder to never judge a person's worth by his or her appearance, as many performances surprise in a good way. 

User Reviews

Adult Written bySher S. March 5, 2017

Ur music quality i

Music system quality is seems week because contestants singing well and musicians playing awoesom but I don't know but I can't connect with music M... Continue reading
Adult Written byM&M1995 August 16, 2014

Music competition show has unique twist but hits a sour note.

Rising Star needs to be commended for its original concept. In this show, the fate of the aspiring singers rests in the hands of the viewers (with some input fr... Continue reading
Kid, 9 years old July 21, 2014

AWESOME!!!

I think it teaches kids what ever you love, go for it and it can happen. Now there is some minor swearing in the show but the talk so fast you can barely hear i... Continue reading
Kid, 11 years old July 15, 2014

Good show!

Rising star is pretty much my favorite show ever! (This summer..) I think the contestants sing choices are pretty appropriate. God message never to give up I... Continue reading

What's the story?

In RISING STAR, singing hopefuls compete for real-time votes from audience members, home viewers, and a celebrity panel comprising Brad Paisley, Kesha, and Ludacris. Hosted by Josh Groban, the show has a twist on the standard vocal-contest format that puts contestants behind a giant wall that blocks their view from the audience and the judges. During each 90-second performance, viewers and the experts use the show's app to swipe a vote for or against the singer(s) as a gauge on-screen calculates the percentage of those votes falling in the contestant's favor. (Each "yes" vote from a celebrity panelist earns the contestant an additional seven percent.) If that number reaches the 70 percent mark, the wall rises, indicating to the singer that he or she is moving on to the next round.

Is it any good?

More than a decade ago, American Idol forever changed the nature of television by putting viewers in control of crowning a new pop-culture star. A lot has changed since then, and plenty of like-minded series have tried to match wits with the alpha show, but, despite new gimmicks at every turn, few stand the test of time. So seems the destiny of Rising Star, which suffers from a gracious but slightly awkward first-time host in Groban and three celebrity panelists who at times seem desperate for the spotlight themselves. This translates to far too much juvenile bantering among them and ridiculously dramatic reactions to the mediocre singers in particular, all of which seems like a ploy to kill time between performances.

Of course, many viewers will tune in just to see how the show manages real-time voting, and this does add a much-needed element of excitement to the otherwise mundane package. For those performers who hit the 70 percent mark, there's the instant gratification of seeing an adoring audience before them. For those who don't, it just makes the moment that much more uncomfortable given that they're sent packing a mere two minutes after they step onto the stage. As for viewers, because you must watch the show live to vote (and only those who vote stand the chance of seeing their profile pictures flash on the performers' walls), there's no chance of recording the show and taking part in the voting process. What's more, West Coast viewers' votes only matter for contestants who fail to move on in an earlier time zone, which makes for pretty anticlimactic reality TV for later viewers.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about the popularity of reality contests. Do you think this fad will ever die out? What accounts for continued attempts such as this one to ride the wave started by American Idol? Is there value to this kind of entertainment? 

  • Teens: Do you think 90 seconds is adequate to accurately judge these contestants' talents? To what extent does physical appearance influence your assessment in that amount of time? Is it fair to incorporate that into your decision? 

  • What do you make of the device-dependent voting process? Is it merely a sign of the times? How much time do your teens spend in front of a screen? What are the drawbacks to increased screen time

TV details

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

For kids who love music and dance

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate