Room for Debate

Website review by
Stephanie Trautman, Common Sense Media
Room for Debate Website Poster Image
Variety of experts debate topics, but depth, info limited.

Parents say

age 14+
Based on 1 review

Kids say

No reviews yetAdd your rating

Did this review miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive, diverse representations in books, TV shows, and movies. Want to help us help them? Suggest a diversity update

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this website.

Educational Value

Kids can learn from a great deal of debatable topics, particularly ones that teens may not be completely familiar with, such as "The A.D.A. 25 Years Later" or "Racist Symbols to Reconsider." The depth at which these topics are covered is wonderful, as opinions are shared from all sides and allow teens to think outside their own minds and perspectives and agree with, go against, or empathize with others. Other than reading about the different opinions, teens won't take much more of an active role, so discussion with a parent, teacher, or other adult may be helpful. For kids interested in learning about many topics that shape or constantly plague society, Room for Debate could be an excellent resource to fulfill their curiosity.

Positive Messages

Since site is based on debatable topics, there are going to be all sorts of sides to each topic, some positive, others quite negative, with people playing devil's advocate.

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that Room for Debate is created by the New York Times and is full of hot topics debated by different individuals. Each offers an expert opinion of the topic, and people can type comments. The comments are moderated Monday through Friday, and both users of the site and the New York Times staff choose their favorites, which can be explored by users. The site offers interesting perspectives on topics that will make kids think about or rethink the way they see things.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written September 22, 2016

An Interesting Tool for Debate

I found this tool so helpful to my students to understand the debate procedures and structure. Students also Learnt a lot from this tool the debate diction and... Continue reading

There aren't any reviews yet. Be the first to review this title.

What's it about?

ROOM FOR DEBATE is the New York Times' opinion site where knowledgeable outsiders share perspectives on news events. The site's home page displays several recent posts from the site's "panelists," and users can explore all public posts via the navigation at the top of the page. Users can then comment on the issues raised in these essays. Responses appear in two columns -- for and against -- below the topic's description. Users can also create a free account using an email address or a social media account (Twitter, Facebook, or Google accounts all work). Readers then can submit their own Debates or Discussions, tag them with a category from the premade list, add an image, add other tags to offer further description, and then add "panelists" for the conversation.

Is it any good?

There are some debates and some content started already on this discussion site, but their accuracy and impact are pretty limited. There are pockets of content that are strong; for example, there's some good content on Haiti that brings up issues kids might not have considered, and there are some (highly technical) questions about Web development that might appeal to some more tech-minded types.

That being said, there's really not a lot here, and there aren't good safeguards in place (such as dedicated moderators) to prevent debates and discussions from devolving into the same flame wars you might find in comment sections or on social media elsewhere. Further, the panelists on the site's premade content have limited authority and don't make especially compelling arguments; few cite credible sources or offer cogent arguments, and they don't offer models that kids or adults should emulate. Additionally, the debates and discussions that include back-and-forths are a little tough to read; it's hard to tell visually which post responds to which. Further, the image-search feature brings up some iffy content when you create your own debates and discussions, making this a questionable resource for the classroom. Overall, this is a great concept for a site, but look elsewhere for a rich experience to support kids' developing debating skills.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about media impact, bias, and opinion. How obvious is it that site discussions are based on one person's opinion?

  • Families can also talk about the importance of sources. Are your information sources reliable, authoritative, and useful?

Website details

Our editors recommend

For kids who love debates

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate