Parents' Guide to Geostorm

Movie PG-13 2017 109 minutes
Geostorm Poster Image

Common Sense Media Review

Michael Ordona By Michael Ordona , based on child development research. How do we rate?

age 13+

Tons of CGI disaster/sci-fi mayhem; eye-rolling story.

Parents Need to Know

Why Age 13+?

Any Positive Content?

Parent and Kid Reviews

age 12+

Based on 13 parent reviews

Parents say the movie offers a mix of opinions, with some praising its intense action and engaging story, while others criticize it for an abundance of inappropriate content and a predictable plot. It seems to appeal to kids and teens who enjoy disaster films, but parents express concerns about the language and sexual content that weren't well-represented in its promotional materials.

  • action-packed
  • inappropriate content
  • mixed reviews
  • predictable plot
  • family appeal
  • age concerns
Summarized with AI

age 11+

Based on 19 kid reviews

Kids say that while this film received mixed reviews, many found it entertaining due to its action-packed sequences and visual effects, though some criticized the plot as lacking depth and coherence. The movie contains a significant amount of violence and strong language, making it more suitable for teens and adults rather than younger audiences.

  • action-packed
  • mixed reviews
  • strong language
  • plot issues
  • suitable for teens
Summarized with AI

What's the Story?

In the near future of GEOSTORM, a global network of satellites is created to not just slow the effects of climate change but actually control the weather. When the maverick genius who created the system gets fired, accidents start happening -- with lethal results. But as these unexplained events grow in frequency, it turns out that they might not be accidents after all. Can big-brained bad boy outsider Jake (Gerard Butler) and his politically adept brother, Max (Jim Sturgess), solve the mystery before these events combine to create one, unstoppable storm that could kill us all?

Is It Any Good?

Our review:
Parents say ( 13 ):
Kids say ( 19 ):

The forecast calls for a CGI haze that can't obscure increasing clouds of laughability, resulting in a Category 4 eye-rolling storm. When you buy a ticket for a sci-fi/disaster movie, you know you're signing a suspension-of-disbelief contract. No worries! Sit back, relax, and enjoy the CGI. But Geostorm strains that contract to its breaking point. We start with the notion that in 2019 (so soon!), a global network of satellites will shoot stuff into the air to control the weather. (Apparently, this will be necessary because climate change will kill two million people in one day in a major city.) OK. But within a film's world, people should still have to behave as if there are rules. Here, it seems to come as a total shock to everyone that anyone would think of weaponizing such godlike power ... even though it's in the hands of the country that created the atomic bomb.

Geostorm lives and dies by its visual effects; disaster junkies will get their fix of Hong Kong, Moscow, and other major cities getting destroyed by magic weather powers. But its true inspiration comes from whodunits and '70s paranoia thrillers, as the good guys try to unravel a conspiracy before the manipulated system creates the geostorm that will end us all. Bad boy Butler, who's becoming a bit of a warning sign for ticket buyers, battles/teams up with by-the-rules Sturgess (in a non-administration-approved haircut) to solve the mystery. Helping out are two criminally underused actresses, Alexandra Maria Lara as a space station commander and Abbie Cornish as a powerful Secret Service agent, plus rising star/scene stealer Zazie Beetz as a highly skilled IT tech. Beetz gets the laughs, Cornish provides the action, and the wonderful Lara deserves more screen time. But that's it for the highlights, as Geostorm clearly wasn't thought through too carefully. When things go wrong, instead of sending up 100 scientists to analyze it, the president sends one man (guess who?); the most basic questions of the investigation come as a surprise to all; there are one-passenger shuttle flights (think of the cost, even in coach); clumsy exposition hobbles many scenes; and an attempt at brotherly drama goes nowhere. Even the CGI destruction doesn't satisfy. The only interesting dialogue comes in one scene near the end, when the mystery is solved. The real mystery, though, is whether disaster movies have run their course for now, as we've all become inured to VFX. That's a question for another day, and Geostorm isn't the answer.

Talk to Your Kids About ...

  • Families can talk about Geostorm's violence. What's the appeal of disaster movies? The enormity and frequency of massive-scale destruction can be overwhelming. Is this kind of violence more or less upsetting than gory horror movies? Why?

  • How are real-world issues like climate change typically handled in movies? Is this film an effective way to examine that particular issue (i.e., does it make you think, does it seem like a realistic extension of that idea)?

  • Did the villain have a point at the end, in terms of what the "positive" result of these actions could be? What would you have done, if presented with the same choice?

  • How does this movie compare to other "disaster movies" you may have seen? Why has this genre always been so popular? Do you think a disaster like this could actually occur?

Movie Details

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by

Geostorm Poster Image

What to Watch Next

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate