Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
- Review Date: May 27, 2010
- Rated: PG-13
- Genre: Fantasy
- Release Year: 2010
- Running Time: 103 minutes
Common Sense Media says
Tepid video-game fantasy flick tame enough for young teens.
- Review Date: May 27, 2010
- Rated: PG-13
- Genre: Fantasy
- Release Year: 2010
- Running Time: 103 minutes
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time gallery
What parents need to know
Positive role models
Violence
Sex
Language
Consumerism
Drinking, drugs, & smoking
Parents Need to Know
Parents need to know that this fantasy adventure -- based on a popular, teen-rated video game -- is high on action, but relatively low on anything else potentially objectionable for young teens (though, like many big action movies, the marketing targets kids too young for this kind of action). The sexuality is limited to some obvious flirting (longing gazes and occasional chaste touching) and a couple of kisses, and strong language is virtually non-existent. Violence, however, is prevalent throughout the movie, with the protagonist constantly on the run, being chased, and having to dodge arrows, blades, flames, and snakes. Despite the amount of violence, it's still not as gory or bloody as comparable movies. Ultimately, the message of family and honor is a valuable one, and the lovely princess isn't just a damsel in distress.
User reviews
Parents say
Kids say
What's the story?
Dastan (Jake Gyllenhaal) is an unusual PRINCE OF PERSIA; he's a street orphan the righteous King Sharaman (Ronald Pickup) adopts after seeing him act bravely in the market square. Fifteen years after his adoption, Dastan leads a charge on the sacred city of Alamut based on iffy intelligence. The beautiful Princess of Alamut, Tamina (Gemma Arterton) is betrothed to Dastan, but immediately after the announcement, King Sharaman dies wearing a poisoned cloak an innocent Dastan presented to him. On the run, Dastan and Tamina try to evade capture by Persian soldiers while they attempt to figure out which Persian member of court actually killed the king and protect a mystical dagger that can disastrously turn back "the sands of time."
Is it any good?
QUALITY
Based on the immensely popular video game, this action adventure will surely attract hardcore gamers, though how they will react to the movie version is yet unclear. What is clear is that this two-hour adventure is a take-off of basically every other swashbuckling epic in the genre (from 300 to Indiana Jones) with charming leads and heavy special effects.
Gyllenhaal and Arterton (who are ample eye-candy for those looking for biceps-and-abs or provocatively dressed beauty to ogle) at least look like they're having a good time fleeing sword-wielding assassins. A scowling and smirking Ben Kingsley never quite reaches the right tone as the double-crossing late king's brother, who is (obviously) the real villain of the story. The incredibly talented Alfred Molina, however, is on hand as the sixth-century equivalent of a casino owner to provide funny socio-political zingers about taxes and government corruption. It's a shame the movie wasn't about Molina's opportunistic Sheik Amar, who organizes ostrich races people bet on, and his bodyguard Seso (English actor Steve Toussaint), a master knife-thrower. That would've been endlessly more compelling than this underwhelming video-game fantasy.
Families can talk about...
Families can talk about the movie's message about family bonds and being a person of honor above all else. How did Dastan act honorably? What sacrifices was he willing to make to save Persia? Who in real life do you consider to be people of honor?
How does the movie compare to the video game? Are the same themes and quests involved? Do you think the movie is a giant advertisement for the video game, or does it stand on its own?
Princess Tamina is sometimes in need of rescuing, but is other times quite capable of defending herself, fighting villains. Which "version" of Tamina do you prefer? What do you think about her arranged marriage to Dastan?
Some critics have said it's wrong for white actors to play the main characters, who were clearly supposed to be Persian. What do you make of this?
The film's marketing and toy-tie ins are aimed at kids who are too young for the movie. How does this impact parents who think the movie is too mature for their kid?
Movie details
| Theatrical release date: | May 28, 2010 |
| DVD release date: | September 14, 2010 |
| Cast: | Alfred Molina, Ben Kingsley, Gemma Arterton, Jake Gyllenhaal |
| Director: | Mike Newell |
| Studio: | Walt Disney Pictures |
| Genre: | Fantasy |
| Run time: | 103 minutes |
| MPAA rating: | PG-13 |
| MPAA explanation: | intense sequences of violence and action |
Great handpicked alternatives
For kids who love fantasy
Browse more movies
Top advice and articles
What parents and kids say
Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review
A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines
QUALITY
Some intense battle, but overall a safe bet for kids
We saw the movie with our two daughters. They loved it. I liked the fact that they could make a movie that was action-packed without any curse words or overt sexual innuendo. What little innuendo in the movie is so minute, it passes right over younger kids' heads. And for violence, I would really put it milder than any Indiana Jones movie. Worth seeing.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Was this review useful?
QUALITY
Great movie, feel free to take along younger kid as well
I just went and saw this movie yesterday. Before, I had looked at some reviews saying that it wasn't such a good movie and it was hard to follow the storyline. In my opinion it was easily followed and enjoyed. My brother, who is 9, loved it and said it was an awesome movie. My sister, who is 6, said it was okay but kinda scary, as there are some scenes that are violent, but very little blood. So get off your computer and go and see it!
What other families should know
Too much violence
Great role models
Was this review useful?
QUALITY
What other families should know
Too much violence
Great role models
Was this review useful?