Resident Evil

Movie review by Nell Minow, Common Sense Media
Resident Evil Poster Image

Common Sense says

age 18+

An ultra-gory video game-to-movie disappointment.

R 2002 100 minutes

Parents say

age 15+

Based on 16 reviews

Kids say

age 14+

Based on 41 reviews

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.

A Lot or a Little?

The parents' guide to what's in this movie.

Community Reviews

age 13+

Implied sex/nudity flag for eyes & ears under 13yo.

As for this specific property, don’t expect much…because there’s not much of anything to this film, period. Resident Evil is generally considered a horror property, but this is no horror film. The bulk it’s production complexity is in the way the team managed to deliver two scenes of female nudity without showing any body parts. Namely, shortly after the opening sequence in Alice intro 1, and at the end, after the fade-out: Alice intro 2, when they set up the sequel. *The early CGI is shockingly bad, even for the early 2000’s. (Silver-lining for parents: comical CG fail renders the gore moot to minimal, even by today’s standards. It’s mostly implied, and when they attempt to show people rotting, eaten, killed, sliced into pieces, etc, it is so poorly rendered it is less convincing than you’d expect, and certainly not horrifying, unless you spent money to see it.) There is no character development, and the script is baffling, (especially in comparison to OG source material—which is saying something). The only semblances are the zombies, monsters, a virus, and names “Umbrella” and “Raccoon City”. Everything else is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . *Sexual content* Two separate “flashback” sequences each depict a naked man & woman rolling around on top of each other in a bed. The flashing sequence combined with audible moans from the woman, imply intercourse. However, no mechanics of intercourse are depicted and no genitals are shown. *Nudity* The two intro shots of “Alice”, the female lead, are non-sexual nudity. A strange concept to some. She is shown as close to fully nude as possible. The camera even pans around her giving the viewer the feeling that they’re going to eventually get a good look—but they end without showing body parts. Second intro is at the end of the film, after a fade-out. In both shots, Alice is in a “waking up confused” situation, taking the nudity out of sexual context. However, the scenes are easily flag-worthy if you’re watching with a child or other person with whom the memory of a survey of female anatomy might linger. I don’t tend to see the female form as inherently sexual, but anyone who might will likely find these to be playboy level depictions of the actress, for no reason whatsoever except bait. They fit the concept of “Born Sexy Yesterday” like a glove. The single redeeming element I can even begin to put a finger on regarding this film is the A.I. character. The characterization of entity is lite, but she is given more substance than any other character in the film. I saw this in theater back in 2002, and cannot major regrets. However, after giving it a second viewing twenty years later, I am comfortable declaring it worethless. If source material and other adaptations didn’t exist, I would call it a “B movie”. This is an instance of snagging massive branding power for a failed attempt to compete with The Matrix…which isn’t even in the horror genre. Sadly, a quality RE film would’ve eventually been huge, had they only waited, crafted a story resembling the source material, and scripted/shot it as a horror film.
age 15+

Mediocre Adaptation of a great Video Game Franchise

As a big fan of the games this film is based off of, it was very disappointing. I'm 99% sure that the director of this film, Paul Anderson (yes I am gonna ignore the W.S. in his name) never played any of the games. Like, this film was released in 2002. By this time there were multiple games and books to at least inspire this film, but the only monsters they take from the franchise are generic zombies and badly animated CGI "lickers", in quotes because in this film the main kicker looks like absolute garbage. Also, Alice (Milla Jojovich) is the most bland, OP action movie protagonist of all time, which is a shame. Okay, enough fanboy whining. This movie is surprisingly tame in regards to violence, like a strong PG-13. There's a scene where Milla Jojovich awakes with amnesia in a shower, and you can see some side nipple. A very brief 2 second flashback where Alice is having sex with a man (no actual nudity seen, but bare backs and such). *SPOILER WARNING* In the end, Alice is half naked with just a white cloth covering her down to the thighs. If you slow down and pause the film at around 1:30:57 you can see some of Alice's..... crotchal re-- okay, I'll be blunt, you see her vagina. You have to look hard to see it though. Ah, I remember me and my friend would slow the footage down to see it back in the early 2000's. Infrequent swearing, maybe 4-5 F bombs. Overall, generic popcorn flick. 2/10.

This title has:

Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing

Movie Details

Our Editors Recommend

  • The Matrix Poster Image

    The Matrix

    Intense, but many teens will be able to handle it.

    age 15+
  • 2001: A Space Odyssey Poster Image

    2001: A Space Odyssey

    Kubrick's sci-fi masterpiece is still relevant.

    age 12+
  • Dark City Poster Image

    Dark City

    Mind-stretching, futuristic sci-fi can get gory.

    age 16+

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate