The Hills Have Eyes (2006) Movie Poster Image

The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

Grim remake of '70s slasher film. Not for kids.
  • Rated: R
  • Genre: Horror
  • Release Year: 2006
  • Running Time: 105 minutes

What parents need to know

Positive messages

Mutants are mad; bumbling humans are dumb; only the enraged, vengeful young father triumphs.

Violence

Bloody, grotesque assaults on traveling family by human mutants; infant in danger (carried off by mutants); dogs yelp off screen and their bloody bodies are discovered by horrified humans; mutants eat human and dog corpses; bird's head bitten off; graphic injuries and body parts (including a bloody head and some deformed heads).Repulsive rape of a young mother, plus repeated sexualized violence.

Sex

Sexualized violence.

Language

Frequent profanity, including repeated use of f-words, s-word, "-of-a-bitch."

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

Characters smoke, drink, and show effects of radiation (deformities and cannibalism).

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that this film is absolutely not for kids. It includes incessant, vicious attacks on a family traveling through the New Mexican desert by a group of mutants. The violence is startling, explicit, and aggressive (dogs are knifed and eviscerated; humans suffer knifing, dismembering, shooting, burning at a stake). Someone bites off a parakeet's head. The monstrous mutants watch their prey through binoculars, which the film renders as spooky "surveillance" imagery. Women appear undressed as monsters try to rape them. Characters smoke, drink beer and margaritas, and refer to "the chronic"/pot. Opening credits sequence features ghastly victims of radiation, in jars and photos.

What's the story?

Gruesome and then some, the new HILLS HAVE EYES again pits two families against one another. In one corner of the New Mexico desert traipse the Carters, including retired cop Big Bob (Ted Levine), his churchy wife Ethel (Kathleen Quinlan) and their mostly grown kids, new mom Lynn (Vinessa Shaw) and her liberal-leaning husband Doug (Aaron Stanford), adolescent Bobby (Dan Byrd), and slightly younger Brenda (Emilie de Ravin). In the hills, a family of mutants watches the Carters, until it's time to strike. Their faces are doughy and misshapen, bodies bent and filthy, and snaggly-sharp teeth perfect for ripping flesh from bones. First, they kill one of the Carters' two German shepherds, leaving it for young Bobby to find. He's so scared that when he makes his way back to the broken down trailer where the rest of the family awaits a never-coming rescue, he doesn't tell them what he found, concerned he might scare them. This is only one of many bad ideas made by the California-bound vacationers (the first is to take the "shortcut" directions down an unpaved road).

Is it any good?

QUALITY

Alexandre Aja's revisitation of Wes Craven's 1977 original is true to its source, making the same basic social and political points with about as much subtlety. (In 1945, the U.S. military irradiated miners during atomic testing, and the victims' kin remained fond of eating people.) Most of the mutants are men, which explain their kids, including a little girl in a red hood. She provides an emotional and ethical counterpoint to her elders, though she's more mascot than complicated character.

The mutants descend on the hapless travelers in veritable droves. Aja and DP Maxime Alexandre's mobile, precise camerawork creates a perverse elegance, even as the film exploits ugliness and abuse. While Craven and his peers conjured nightmares in the wake of the Vietnam war, this new generation of slasher aficionados and makers is working amid mass mediated torture, war, and moral mayhem. No wonder their visions are bleak.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about the film's two family units: How do the travelers/victims turn desperate and become like their attackers? How do the film's graphic displays of violence (now a staple of horror/slasher movies) serve specific functions? Do viewers want to be scared or repulsed, to identify with victims or monsters, or to take pleasure in the technical expertise of the violence? Why do horror movies remain so popular, especially with teens?

Movie details

Theatrical release date:March 10, 2006
DVD/Streaming release date:June 20, 2006
Cast:Aaron Stanford, Emilie de Ravin, Ted Levine
Director:Alexandre Aja
Studio:Fox Searchlight
Genre:Horror
Run time:105 minutes
MPAA rating:R
MPAA explanation:strong gruesome violence and terror throughout, and for language.

This review of The Hills Have Eyes (2006) was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Ratings

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate.

Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Adult Written byDogcrazed June 22, 2011

Over the top unexceptable

The sexualized violence and rape is totally uncalled for, if I were to have basically any girlfriend of mine see it they would be miserable and scarred for life and would have to work through a lot of emotional problems to work through after this. The violence is over the top in general. But the sexual violence is totally uncalled for. It feeds to viewers that it's exciting to be scared by this and honestly I feel that it would encourage those who are unstable to try it. I don't think it's acceptable for anyone to view, let alone children, sexual violence victims, or those who are faint of heart.
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Teen, 15 years old Written byTheSuperman765 April 16, 2011

i rate ths title OFF for ages 16+

What to watch out for * Messages: Mutants are mad; bumbling humans are dumb; only the enraged, vengeful young father triumphs. * Violence: Bloody, grotesque assaults on traveling family by human mutants; infant in danger (carried off by mutants); dogs yelp off screen and their bloody bodies are discovered by horrified humans; mutants eat human and dog corpses; bird's head bitten off; graphic injuries and body parts (including a bloody head and some deformed heads).Repulsive rape of a young mother, plus repeated sexualized violence. * Sex: Sexualized violence. * Language: Frequent profanity, including repeated use of f-words, s-word, "-of-a-bi-ch." * Consumerism: Not an issue. * Drinking, drugs, & smoking: Characters smoke, drink, and show effects of radiation (deformities and cannibalism).
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Teen, 13 years old Written byCharlCoetzee13 April 8, 2013

Hills Have Eyes

Some sense are very intense and some arent . But it is more for older children . And advise dont watch at night!!!
What other families should know
Great messages
Too much violence
Too much swearing