The Road to El Dorado Movie Poster Image

The Road to El Dorado

(i)

 

Outstanding family movie mixes comedy, action, romance.
Popular with kids
  • Review Date: May 19, 2003
  • Rated: PG
  • Genre: Family and Kids
  • Release Year: 2000
  • Running Time: 89 minutes

What parents need to know

Educational value

While intended to entertain, this film does provide a sense of the brutal first encounters between the gold-seeking Spanish conquistadors and the native tribes they destroyed.

Positive messages

As Sir Elton John sings as Miguel and Tulio try to leave El Dorado, "Friends Never Say Goodbye."

Positive role models

While Tulio and Miguel are con artists who at first believe they have stumbled onto a "golden" opportunity, they both grow to appreciate the kindness and loving natures of the citizens of El Dorado.

Violence & scariness

Cartoonish violence. Characters fight with swords, but no one gets hurt. A piranha bites a character on the rear end. A human sacrifice is narrowly averted. A character is hit in the side of the head with a bag filled with gold. Characters are chased by a giant demon dog brought to life by the high priest of the tribe. Characters are nearly crushed by a giant statue toppling over. A character cuts his hand with a knife and wipes his blood on a statue.

Sexy stuff

Brief, nonsexual nudity after a group of monkeys steal the clothes belonging to Miguel and Tulio. A male and female character kiss and lie next to each other; their kissing is interrupted by a character looking for them.

Language

"Hell."

Consumerism
Not applicable
Drinking, drugs, & smoking

A character holds a cigar, but does not smoke. Characters raise glasses to toast, but have their drinks spilled and broken before they can drink. Characters are shown holding drinks with fruit slices and umbrella garnishes.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that The Road to El Dorado is a DreamWorks animated film about two Spanish con artists from the early 16th century who discover the fabled lost "city of gold" in the New World and are treated as gods by the tribe who lives there. Some cartoonish violence -- sword fights between characters, a character cutting his hand with a knife, and characters nearly being crushed by a giant statue -- as well as brief, nonsexual nudity, and scenes where male and female characters kiss and lie next to each other. A scene in which a giant monster-dog goes after the main characters might be a bit much for younger viewers.

What's the story?

THE ROAD TO EL DORADO is set in 1519, as Cortes is planning "to conquer the New World for Spain, for glory and for gold." Miguel (voiced by Kenneth Branaugh) and Tulio (voiced by Kevin Kline) accidentally stow away, along with their one possession, a map to El Dorado, the legendary land of gold. They escape in a rowboat and land on a coast that looks just like the one in their map. They follow the map to the city of gold, and are welcomed as gods by the friendly chief (voice of Edward James Olmos) and his less friendly priest Tzekel-Kan (voice of Armand Assante). They are also welcomed by Chell (voice of Rosie Perez), who knows they are con men, but promises to help them if they will take her with them when they go. As they struggle to behave like gods, Miguel and Tulio begin to care about what happens to the people of El Dorado as Tzekel-Kan and Cortes try to grab what they want. Friendly rivalry turns hostile as Miguel thinks of staying behind and Tulio and Chell fall in love. The final conflict forces them to find out what their priorities really are.

Is it any good?

QUALITY

Dreamworks Animation SKG steps up to the Disney gold standard with this sensationally entertaining animated adventure. Kevin Kline and Kenneth Branaugh were in the same room when recording their dialogue, and it paid off. Kline and Branaugh, both classically trained and both masters of improvisation, bring humor and spontaneity to the relationship of the two characters, adding life and electricity to a medium that can often seem too staid. Think Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid crossed with a Bob Hope and Bing Crosby road picture. It's no coincidence that the "Road to" title and one of the best gags in the movie pay loving tribute to the Hope-Crosby series.

The animation is terrific; the character's expressive faces are especially well done. El Dorado is suitably magical, and the scenes with humor and tension are expertly handled, especially a high-stakes basketball-style game and the climactic escape. Aside from the lackluster Elton John-Tim Rice score, this is an outstanding family movie.

Families can talk about...

  • Families can talk about Tulio's statement: "You know that voice that tells people to quit when they're ahead? Miguel, you don't have one." What does that mean? Why does Miguel take risks that Tulio thinks are not wise?

  • How do you think The Road to El Dorado compares with other animated movies you've seen? Is it as funny an action-packed as others you've liked?

  • Ask kids if they understand what a con man is, and if they think Tulio and Miguel will continue to cheat people in the future.

Movie details

Theatrical release date:March 31, 2000
DVD release date:December 12, 2000
Cast:Kenneth Branagh, Kevin Kline, Rosie Perez
Director:Eric Bibo Bergeron
Studio:DreamWorks
Genre:Family and Kids
Topics:Adventures, Friendship
Run time:89 minutes
MPAA rating:PG
MPAA explanation:mild thematic material and language

This review of The Road to El Dorado was written by

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are conducted by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

Quality

Our star rating assesses the media's overall quality.

Find out more

Learning ratings

  • Best: Really engaging; great learning approach.
  • Very Good: Engaging; good learning approach.
  • Good: Pretty engaging; good learning approach.
  • Fair: Somewhat engaging; OK learning approach.
  • Not for Learning: Not recommended for learning.
  • Not for Kids: Not age-appropriate for kids; not recommended for learning.

Find out more

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

About Our Rating System

The age displayed for each title is the minimum one for which it's developmentally appropriate. We recently updated all of our reviews to show only this age, rather than the multi-color "slider." Get more information about our ratings.

Great handpicked alternatives

What parents and kids say

See all user reviews

Share your thoughts with other parents and kids Write a user review

A safe community is important to us. Please observe our guidelines

Parent of a 7 and 10 year old Written bytrollbabyfeet March 25, 2010

Totally inappropriate movie for children

I was stunned by the blatant sensuality and the language in this film. I couldn't get past either of these issues, and we turned the movie off and threw it away (it had been a gift).
What other families should know
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Teen, 16 years old Written byGraycie August 13, 2013

Why I Had a Problem with "The Road to El Dorado"

I'd seen gifs of the guitar-strumming scoundrels on tumblr, and heard my friends talk about it as one of their favorite childhood movies, so I wondered why I wasn't in on the little DreamWorks animated adventure called, "The Road to El Dorado." Growing up, my parents had a strict Disney-and-Nick-Jr.-only policy. I was raised on images of mermaids and gorillas and talking candlesticks. I was fed a steady diet of love stories and inspiring quips and heartbreaking death scenes. Alan Menken provided the soundtrack to my life, with Phil Collins as the opening act. Films like "Prince of Egypt," "Anastasia," and "The Road to El Dorado" were passed off as "dumb copies." So I never saw them. That is, until, at the age sixteen, a funny textpost on tumblr made me decide to rent "El Dorado," just for kicks. At first, I had a pretty open mind. I thought the animation was a bit less fluid and detailed as Disney's, but it wasn't a huge issue. I liked Miguel, with his outlandish facial expressions and intense strumming. I was laughing within the first five minutes, although I was a bit put-off by Miguel's inexplicable British accent and Tulio's oddly American one. It would have been a lot better if they had actual Spanish accents, in my opinion, or at least all the same accent. But anyway, I thought they had a really good set-up here: two con men (something relatively strange to kid's movies) lie to obtain a goal, get caught in their lie (that's right kids: lying is wrong!), and must play off each other to escape (ah yes, humor and action!). The horse on the boat thing was humorous, and I loved the two men's dying confessions as they thought they'd never reach shore. I was really liking Miguel as a character; he was an innocent adventurer while Tulio was greedy and conniving. The only reason he went along with Miguel to find the city in the first place was so that he could steal its gold. OK. I was sure he would have a change of heart by the end of the film and realize the value of friendship and such, so I wasn't too concerned. I was also taken aback by their two naked butts running through the jungle, but OK. A butt is a butt. There's nothing wrong with an innocent butt. When the pair reached the lost city, they were met by a woman with a stolen object and curvaceous hips. I was intrigued: who was this woman? Why did she steal the thing? What was she trying to escape from? These questions were quickly answered as she overheard Tulio and Miguel reveling in the fact that the citizens of El Dorado thought they were gods. "I want in on the scam," she said, "so I can get out. You think you're the only one who dreams of a better life? " Ah, so she's a rebel with a cause, a woman taking charge and turning her bad situation around. I liked this. Except her cause was simply that she wanted to go be rich someplace else because she was bored of her magnificent city. I kept waiting to see how oppressed she was. Maybe she was an outcast, or lonely, or feeling caged in. But she wasn't. Now, there's nothing wrong with wanting something different, we all do that. But it was how selfish and stereotypical she was portrayed that rubbed me the wrong way. Chel had a lot of potential to be a complex and intriguing anti-heroine. I was interested in her. Yet throughout the entire movie, she was nothing but a devious vixen, sashaying her hips and pouting her lips in barely-there clothing and helping the two Spaniards lie and cheat their way to piles of gold. While I liked how her realistic, pear-shaped body was markedly different from the unattainably swan-like figures of the Disney princesses, her character was never developed beyond her voluptuous backside. I've heard it said that misogynists see women characters in one of four ways: mothers, witches, flirts, and virgins. They put their women into stereotypical, one-dimensional boxes and focus instead on developing the "more important" male characters. This definitely happened here, and Chel definitely was painted as "the flirt." From the first time Miguel and Tulio met her, they claimed she was a temptation, ignoring her brain (which she claimed would be valuable to them - she actually didn't do much but stand back and watch them blunder, shaking her head) and focusing just on her bombshell body. As it became clear that Tulio wasn't so keen on teaming up with her, she literally starts performing sexual favors for him in order to win him over (ok, this is never overtly stated, but is strongly implied). OK - it's perfectly fine for a woman to be comfortable with her sexuality. If Chel wants to have sex, fine. It's her life. But then she was using it for her own means, performing sexual favors for repayment. If there had been some sparks and romance between Chel and Tulio, I would have believed that she had sex with him because she genuinely liked him. From what I could tell, though, the only reason she had sex with him, basically seducing him, was so that she could get a bigger share of the gold - gold that they were swindling right out of the hands of innocent people. That's the other thing that bothered me: Miguel and Tulio seemed to be able to lie and cheat their way out of everything, with absolutely no consequences except positivity for them. When I started watching, I was sure that the two would get so mixed up in their web of lies that they'd be caught, but since Miguel had been so kind to the citizens of El Dorado and spared many innocent people from being sacrificed, the people would still give them their boat so that they could get back to Spain safely, teaching the message that lying will not get you anywhere for long but that kindness is remembered and repaid. Instead, the two con men leave the city under the impression that they are still gods, with heaps of gold they conned from the people that had been so gracious to them. Granted, they sacrifice their ship and their gold to keep Cortes out of the city, but still. They lied and deceived up until the very end, for their own personal gain. Suddenly, I was a little glad that I'd only been exposed to Disney. Honestly, I wouldn't want my young son looking up to Tulio and Miguel at all. Miguel was a little better as a role model than Tulio, because of how friendly and kind he'd been to the people of El Dorado, but he was still content to stay in the city as a "god," lying and pretending to be something he wasn't for the rest of his life. Compare that to Disney heroes like Aladdin or Tarzan, who discover that trying to be someone other than yourself is pointless and come to accept and be proud of their true selves, and this doesn't look so good. And Tulio - the only thing he cared about the entire film was money. When his best friend and partner Miguel looked like he wanted stay longer in El Dorado, Tulio was perfectly OK with leaving him behind and taking all the stolen gold for himself. He was so blinded by Chel's curves that he failed to see how she was using him (I still don't buy that she actually cared about him). In the end, he didn't even apologize to Miguel for betraying him, but simply bemoaned the fact that they had lost the gold - never mind that it was for a noble cause (yeah, that line was played for comedic affect, but it still showed that the character had not learned or grown at all). He honestly had more in common with Ratcliffe than John Smith. And Chel - the scheming bombshell who used sex as a means to obtain her own selfish desires - is hardly a role model for young girls. If this was a movie aimed at adults I wouldn't be upset about the sex, but would simply bemoan the poor characterization (a shame, really - screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio managed to create the strong, complex woman Elizabeth Swann in the "Pirates of the Caribbean" films). But this is a kid's film, aimed at young, impressionable little minds, and I wouldn't want my daughter being taught that she should give her body up to men to get what she wants. I guess it really bothered me that she claimed that her knowledge of the El Dorado religion would help them, then showed no real knowledge at all. Instead of making herself a valuable member of the team through wit and intelligence, she used sex. I felt like she could have done better. Compare her to heroines like Mulan, Pocahontas, Ariel, Belle, Megara, and Jane, and it's not even a contest as to who I'd want my daughter looking up to. I just felt like the film was kinda pointless. It didn't send any good messages about friendship or honesty or the value of adventure, even though it was rife with opportunities for them. Instead, I just watched selfish and conniving characters being selfish and conniving. I took nothing away from it besides frustration for the thin, stoic characterization and disappointing plot resolution. Let's just say that next time, I'll be sticking to Disney.
What other families should know
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Too much consumerism
Adult Written byMovieMan26 October 10, 2010

Excellent animated adventure with an outstanding music score

Lackluster music score? Come on, commonsense! Use your common sense! I loved this movie. It stands up there with all of the great animated flicks, such as Toy Story or Shrek. Excellent all around. Parents: There is a surprising amount of sex, violence, and language in this movie. Nothing graphic, but sometimes explicit. Bottom Line: Excellent and a must-own for the entire family. Thanks for reading! - Movie Man
What other families should know
Too much violence
Too much sex
Too much swearing
Great messages

Poll

Did our review help you make an informed decision about this product?

Star Wars Guide