Want personalized picks that fit your family?

Set preferences to see our top age-appropriate picks for your kids.

Get age-based picks

Destroy Build Destroy

TV review by
Will Wade, Common Sense Media
Destroy Build Destroy TV Poster Image
Engineering + explosions = fun reality show for tweens.

Parents say

age 8+
Based on 9 reviews

Kids say

age 9+
Based on 18 reviews

A lot or a little?

The parents' guide to what's in this TV show.

Positive Messages

The show merges some educational lessons about engineering with some age-appropriate thrills of explosions. Teens always have adult supervision and use safety precautions.

Positive Role Models & Representations

There's a good bit of trash-talking between the teams, and it's not always good-natured. A team of skateboarders, for example, is openly contemptuous of their rivals -- self-described math geeks whom they call "dorks." The adults are good mentors.


No fighting, but destruction is a fundamental part of the show. Kids are encouraged to destroy various vehicles or large machines, sometimes using explosives (with help from adult experts).


Some mildly derogatory insults, such as "dork" or referring to a co-ed team as "ladies."

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

What parents need to know

Parents need to know that this engineering-themed reality show is heavy on demolition. Two teams of young people are encouraged to destroy large objects (like cars) and use the wreckage to build a machine of their own. With help from adult experts, the winners get to destroy the losers' creation using TNT, plastic explosives, military-grade weaponry, and other devices capable of inflicting heavy-duty damage. The "build" phase of the show requires some creative thinking and design sense, though the competition and the destruction segments take up much more of the show and present much less of a mental challenge. Expect some trash-talking between the teams, sometimes more good-natured than others.

User Reviews

  • Parents say
  • Kids say
Adult Written byjennijenjen9 June 24, 2011

Not even worth broadcasting, watched.

I did not want to even want to give it a star. This show does not worth even half a star. At this age (around 8) that's when kids start to be bratty, rebel... Continue reading
Adult Written byPrototypeX7 June 29, 2011


Another live-action show that shouldn't be on CARTOON network....
Teen, 15 years old Written byAnimeIsAwesome808 June 4, 2013


One word: Pointless. I'm very glad it's cancelled. They destroy something, the fix it, then destroy it AGAIN. That is not funny at ALL. When I watched... Continue reading
Kid, 12 years old August 5, 2010

Cool show

I love this show. And to all those parents who think that this show will influence there kids, that is not right. Think about, do you really think that after se... Continue reading

What's the story?

In DESTROY BUILD DESTROY, two teams of young people go head-to-head in an engineering-themed competition -- with a healthy dose of destruction thrown in for fun. The show's title describes the three stages of the contest. Host Andrew W.K. starts the action by asking each team to pick a method to destroy something big -- like a car or other major machine -- using high explosives, a team of burly guys armed with heavy tools, dropping it off a cliff, or another equally effective demolition technique. Using the wreckage, the teens must then construct something new that they can use in a contest (think along the lines of a tennis ball air cannon mounted on a movable platform). At the end of the show, the winning team gets to destroy the losing group's creation using even more impressive tools of destruction, including military-grade weaponry or plastic explosives.

Is it any good?

What's not to like about blowing stuff up? And the explosions on this show are seriously big -- which means they're certain to appeal to teen and tween viewers, especially boys. Perhaps not surprisingly, then, even though the point of the show is ostensibly engineering, it's the smallest part. Two-thirds of each episode is about destroying things, and only the building phase requires thinking and creativity. Still, at least the teenage participants aren't handling the explosives (or the power tools, for that matter). They serve more as directors, telling adults what to do and watching the results. Only during the actual contest do the kids really take a hands-on role, though they certainly seem to be having fun through the entire process.

Andrew W.K. and the producers encourage a fair bit of rivalry, and a few of the comments occasionally go a bit too far. A team of skaters, for example, crows that their skills at building skateboard ramps will help them design a superior vehicle and is openly contemptuous of their rivals, a group of self-defined math team geeks whom the skaters deride as "dorks." And in the end, the contest stage seems kind of random -- and the results don't depend all that much on either group's engineering prowess. But at least the explosions are fun to watch.

Talk to your kids about ...

  • Families can talk about which part of the show is more fun to watch -- the building or the destroying. Why? If you were on the show, which part would be more fun to actually be involved with? Do you think it's OK for a TV show to encourage young people to blow up stuff, using real (and really powerful) explosives? Families can also discuss mechanical engineering. What do you think of the teams' designs? Would you have built something differently? How could you improve on their creations?

TV details

Themes & Topics

Browse titles with similar subject matter.

For kids who love finding out how stuff works

Our editors recommend

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate

About these links

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support.

Read more

Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential.

Learn how we rate